You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Business Analytics’ tag.

Most people would describe Teradata as a data warehouse and analytics vendor as my colleague has reviewed its core technology. In addition to that, through its own development and by partnering, the company has branched out into the applications market. One such application is Teradata Relationship Manager (TRM) main purpose is to personalize customer interactions, regardless of channel or type of interaction, although its target area is predominantly marketing.

The product consists of six components: marketing resource management (planning, automating, reporting and managing marketing resources), campaign management (running single or multistage, multichannel marketing campaigns), offer management (working out the best offer based on the customer’s profile and timing of the offer), communication optimization (prioritizing all customer communications regardless of channel), interaction management (delivering information in real time to the point of customer interaction) and analytics (providing data mining and analysis for the business user). Teradata says TRM has been successful, with customers buying some or all of these components, including over three dozen who have upgraded to or purchased the latest version. That release includes several enhancements, the most prominent of which make the product easier for business people to use, extend the number of data sources that can be included in the analysis, and provide more analytics capabilities.

The product basically works on a four-step process: First, data from both offline sources (CRM, ERP, business applications and others) and online sources (including the company Web site or external sources such as Google, Twitter or Facebook) is captured and loaded into industry-specific data models along with master data definitions. Next the data is analyzed to produce information about marketing campaign, brand, product or service, and customer. This analysis is used to deliver information and actions to multiple interaction points (among them the Web, contact centers, stores, kiosks, cell phones and e-mail). Finally it captures the customers’ responses and feeds them back into the data model to help drive the next interaction. This process creates a closed system that is self-learning, which means that future interactions will be based on the very latest information. The system is able to work in real time because Teradata has mixed workload capability to enable its own analytics and those from vendors like IBM SPSS, KXEN and SAS analytics tools to operate in real time, which ensure that the customer is not kept waiting.

Although TRM is focused on marketing, it also fits into what we call customer experience management (CEM). CEM is fundamentally about making the customer experience for any interaction, at any interaction point, as positive as possible while producing the desired business outcome. This can’t be done without first having a complete view of the customer and second delivering the right information to the right interaction point as the customer is interacting with the company. However, my benchmark research into CEM shows that less than one-fifth (17%) of companies believe they are very effective at improving the customer experience. Applying analytics for improving marketing processes can go a long way to addressing your business objectives. I recommend you evaluate TRM to determine how it might help improve your efforts.

Let me know your thoughts or come and collaborate with me on Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

Regards,

Richard Snow – VP & Research Director

My research continues to show that the most important key performance indicator (KPI) for call centers is average call-handling time (AHT). Furthermore, second in importance only to improving customer satisfaction is the challenge of reducing operating costs, which invariably involves trying to reduce AHT, which contact centers need to do without negatively impacting customer satisfaction. An indicator of the complexity of this issue is its persistence as one of the longest-running and most active debates on LinkedIn.

The solution, which runs through many threads of the discussions, hinges on two things: the interaction-handling process and the agents. The interaction-handling process is the steps and activities agents have to go through to answer a customer’s call. Based on my experience as a long time industry consultant, I break this process down into five major steps: identify the customer, identify the issue, resolve the issue, determine whether the caller has any other concerns and finally close the call (which might include a quick customer satisfaction survey). The more complex companies make each of these steps and the more activities their agents have to go through during each step, the longer the average handling time will be. To simplify the process (and reduce the AHT), the first thing to do is understand what agents actually do as they handle a call, and in particular determine whether there is much variation in how different agents handle the same type of call. A key tool for acquiring this information is analytics applied to the agent’s desktop; it is available from vendors like EnkataMetricaNICE SystemsVerint and VPI. These systems capture exactly what agents do at their desktops (the systems they access, the data they enter, their navigation and other actions) and in effect map their interaction-handling processes. With this information, companies can set about optimizing the processes for each type of call and ensuring all agents follow the best practices the company identifies.

This brings us to the other subject of this discussion, the agents. Desktop analytics also can provide insights into what agents are handling what parts of calls well or not as well. This knowledge becomes vital input for training and coaching them. My research into agent performance management shows that on average agents actually receive a lot of training and coaching, but much of it is focused on general issues rather than the individual’s weaknesses. Agent desktop analytics, however, can point out these specific requirements. Then, to ensure that agents are scheduled to received personalized training and coaching, companies can use tools available from vendors such as EnkataEnvisionKnoahSoftMerced SystemsNICE SystemsVerint and VPI. The end result should be more skilled agents, and having skilled agents following best practices should bring down AHT.

One other key element in achieving these joint objectives is the agent’s desktop. My research into the technology used in contact centers confirms what most companies know to be true – the typical agent desktop is a mess. Agents have to log on to multiple applications to start, they typically have to jump around in several applications to resolve any request, they have to enter the same data into multiple applications, and they can’t easily see all the information they need to identify the customer, the issues and the resolution. The answer to this cumbersome technology is better technology, specifically what I call the smart desktop from vendors such as CiceroCincomJacadaNICE SystemsOpenspansalesforce.comSmartpoint and UpstreamWorks. All these tools either replace existing desktops with a new one that has a process-oriented user interface that hides all other applications, or they use a rules-based system to pop information onto an existing desktop and advise agents what to do next. Either way makes the agent’s life that much easier, speeds up processes and reduces the number of potential errors that agents might make. Once again the result should be shorter calls and happier customers – and agents.

Many people, including me, argue that focusing too much on AHT will degrade customer satisfaction simply because agents won’t have enough time and support to deliver great customer experiences. But the technologies outlined above can help lower AHT while ensuring agents have the skills and support to deliver great experiences. I don’t believe the quest to lower contact center operation costs will go away, so I recommend to companies that haven’t yet investigated the benefits these systems can deliver what they do as soon as possible.

Let me know your thoughts or come and collaborate with me on Facebook,LinkedIn and Twitter.

Regards,

Richard Snow – VP & Global Research Director

RSS Richard Snow’s Analyst Perspectives at Ventana Research

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Twitter Updates

Stats

  • 68,536 hits
%d bloggers like this: